Did they sufficiently discuss all aspects of error? Do they critique themselves? If so, you can say this is a good pap
Write a quick summary of the paper. Then write a critique with the following questions in mind: 1. Who funded the study? Is there a conflict of interests? 2. What was the goal and what was actually done in the study? 3. Did they summarize effectively in the introduction? 4. What methods did they use? […]
