Medical Ethics Rubric final paper
Rubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: Signature Assignment Final Paper
| Meets Expectations | Approaches Expectations | Does Not Meet Expectations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Content | Points: Points Range: 48 (40.00%) – 60 (50.00%) Paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied course concepts. Paper includes several high quality, thought- provoking ideas. Topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of the assignment. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 36 (30.00%) – 47.4 (39.50%) Paper does not demonstrate that the author fully understands and has applied course concepts. Paper includes few, if any, thought-provoking ideas or unique insights to the discussion. Topic is not focused narrowly enough for the scope of the assignment. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 35.4 (29.50%) The paper indicates no understanding of the concepts in the course. The paper lacks any exploration of the subject by the author. The topic is unclear or too broad for the scope of the assignment. Feedback: |
| Organization/ Cohesiveness | Points: Points Range: 19.2 (16.00%) – 24 (20.00%) Connections among subtopics and the thesis/topic are clear without being repetitive or redundant. Concluding remarks demonstrate analysis and synthesis of ideas. Writing and integration of source materials is eloquent and skillful. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 14.4 (12.00%) – 18.96 (15.80%) Connections among subtopics are missing or forced. Conclusion is unclear or disconnected from the topic. Writing and integration of source materials is awkward or confusing. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 14.16 (11.80%) Connections among subtopics are missing. Subtopics are not presented. Conclusion is missing or disconnected from the topic. Writing lacks skill. Sources are not present. Feedback: |
| Supporting Evidence/Research | Points: Points Range: 19.2 (16.00%) – 24 (20.00%) Three or more appropriate sources are completely and eloquently integrated throughout the paper. At least one source is from credible, scholarly, peer-reviewed materials. Detailed, meaningful quotations and paraphrases aptly and accurately support the topic. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 14.4 (12.00%) – 18.96 (15.80%) Fewer than three appropriate sources are used. At least one source is from credible, scholarly, peer-reviewed materials. Quotations and paraphrases are lacking or do not support several subtopics. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 14.16 (11.80%) Sources are missing. Paper lacks quotations and paraphrases. Feedback: |
| Mechanics and APA Formatting | Points: Points Range: 9.6 (8.00%) – 12 (10.00%) The assignment consistently follows current APA style format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 7.2 (6.00%) – 9.48 (7.90%) The assignment does not follow current APA style format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing where needed. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 7.08 (5.90%) No attempt to follow APA style format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper. Feedback: |
Show Descriptions Show Feedback
Content–
Levels of Achievement: Meets Expectations 48 (40.00%) – 60 (50.00%) Paper demonstrates that the author fully understands and has applied course concepts. Paper includes several high quality, thought- provoking ideas. Topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of the assignment. Approaches Expectations 36 (30.00%) – 47.4 (39.50%) Paper does not demonstrate that the author fully understands and has applied course concepts. Paper includes few, if any, thought-provoking ideas or unique insights to the discussion. Topic is not focused narrowly enough for the scope of the assignment. Does Not Meet Expectations 0 (0.00%) – 35.4 (29.50%) The paper indicates no understanding of the concepts in the course. The paper lacks any exploration of the subject by the author. The topic is unclear or too broad for the scope of the assignment. Feedback:
Organization/ Cohesiveness–
Levels of Achievement: Meets Expectations 19.2 (16.00%) – 24 (20.00%) Connections among subtopics and the thesis/topic are clear without being repetitive or redundant. Concluding remarks demonstrate analysis and synthesis of ideas. Writing and integration of source materials is eloquent and skillful. Approaches Expectations 14.4 (12.00%) – 18.96 (15.80%) Connections among subtopics are missing or forced. Conclusion is unclear or disconnected from the topic. Writing and integration of source materials is awkward or confusing. Does Not Meet Expectations 0 (0.00%) – 14.16 (11.80%) Connections among subtopics are missing. Subtopics are not presented. Conclusion is missing or disconnected from the topic. Writing lacks skill. Sources are not present. Feedback:
Supporting Evidence/Research–
Levels of Achievement: Meets Expectations 19.2 (16.00%) – 24 (20.00%) Three or more appropriate sources are completely and eloquently integrated throughout the paper. At least one source is from credible, scholarly, peer-reviewed materials. Detailed, meaningful quotations and paraphrases aptly and accurately support the topic. Approaches Expectations 14.4 (12.00%) – 18.96 (15.80%) Fewer than three appropriate sources are used. At least one source is from credible, scholarly, peer-reviewed materials. Quotations and paraphrases are lacking or do not support several subtopics. Does Not Meet Expectations 0 (0.00%) – 14.16 (11.80%) Sources are missing. Paper lacks quotations and paraphrases. Feedback:
Mechanics and APA Formatting–
Levels of Achievement: Meets Expectations 9.6 (8.00%) – 12 (10.00%) The assignment consistently follows current APA style format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly. Approaches Expectations 7.2 (6.00%) – 9.48 (7.90%) The assignment does not follow current APA style format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing where needed. Does Not Meet Expectations 0 (0.00%) – 7.08 (5.90%) No attempt to follow APA style format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper. Feedback:
