Accounting and Finance for Healthcare Managers
Accounting and Finance for Healthcare Managers. The organization I chose to write about is a for – profit hospital. Any and all information collected should be in regards to the same organization. Please follow the guidelines below and include all of the proper information. I also attached the grading rubric. Please feel free to reach out with any questions or concerns. Thanks!Option #1: Healthcare Delivery Organization Presentation
Develop a financial analysis of a healthcare delivery organization of your choosing. The intent of this assignment is to evaluate the financial and operational health of the organization and disseminate the information to the class. You may pursue, analyze, and synthesize any information source you choose (e.g., website content, personal interviews, organizational documentation). Strive to be rigorous and thorough in your research.
Note: For-profit organizations are generally easier to research than not-for-profits as all financials are reportable to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Final Paper Instructions:Projects are not limited in size, should be professional in appearance, and cover (at a minimum) the evaluation of the metrics discussed in Gapenski and Pink (2015), which are detailed in Chapter 13 in the sections about Ratio Analysis, DuPont Analysis, and Operating Indicator Analysis.You may pursue, analyze, and synthesize any information source you choose (e.g., website content, personal interviews, organizational documentation). Strive to be rigorous and thorough in your research.Your final presentation should report on the business’ location(s), competitive market(s), service lines, and business segments, for example. Unless otherwise indicated, a five-year trend analysis—including the most recent year of available information/data—is expected.Do not just report the data—discuss what it means. Ultimately, would you invest in the company? Why or why not?Presentations should adhere to Advisory Board formatting. See the Strategic Plan Template for an example.
HCM301 Module 8 Portfolio Project
HCM301 Module 8 Portfolio Project CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements 40.0 to >32.0 pts
Meets Expectation
The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.32.0 to >24.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.24.0 to >16.0 pts
Below Expectation
The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.16.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content 40.0 to >32.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of accounting and finance in healthcare management; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.32.0 to >24.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge in accounting and finance in healthcare management.24.0 to >16.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge in accounting and finance in healthcare management.16.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis 40.0 to >32.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate critical analysis of accounting and finance in healthcare management.32.0 to >24.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical analysis of accounting and finance in healthcare management.24.0 to >16.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in critical analysis of accounting and finance in healthcare management.16.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate critical analysis.
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Synthesis and Evaluation 40.0 to >32.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in accounting and finance in healthcare management.32.0 to >24.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation of accounting and finance in healthcare management.24.0 to >16.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation of accounting and finance in healthcare management.16.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Presentation 40.0 to >32.0 pts
Meets Expectation
The presentation was highly effective and appropriately addressed the target audience.32.0 to >24.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in selection, application or audience of the presentation.24.0 to >16.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in selection, application or audience of the presentation.16.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
The presentation was totally ineffective and not targeted at the specified audience.
40.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources 20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Cite and report on the business location(s), the competitive market(s), service lines, business segments, etc. Unless otherwise indicated, a five year trend analysis – including the most recent year of available information/data.16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Cite and report on most of the following: the business location(s), the competitive market(s), service lines, business segments, etc. Unless otherwise indicated, a five year trend analysis – including the most recent year of available information/data.12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Cite and report on at least three of the following: the business location(s), the competitive market(s), service lines, business segments, etc. Unless otherwise indicated, a five year trend analysis – including the most recent year of available information/data.8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Does not cite and report on the business location(s), the competitive market(s), service lines, business segments, etc. Unless otherwise indicated, a five year trend analysis – including the most recent year of available information/data.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Application of Source Material 20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization 20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper Advisory Board formatting including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper Advisory Board formatting. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper Advisory Board formatting. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper Advisory Board formatting. Does not conform to project requirements.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar and Style 20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style 20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.
20.0 pts
Total Points: 300.0
