Single-tooth restoration
DENTISTRY:
By (Insert both names)
(Name of class)
(Professor’s name)
(Institution)
(City, State)
(Date)
Single-tooth restoration:
There are a number of options for teeth or tooth replacement options. The dental implants offer an excellent option to the conventional treatment of removable prosthesis or a dental bridge, for example a full denture or partial denture. A lot of people prefer dental implants are their best choice according to (Schmitt 2008).
Types of dental implant:
In dentistry, three are three major procedures dentists replace or restore one or many missing teeth. They include; dental implant/s, dental bridge and partial denture. The most common procedure is a bridge. The method pertain the dentist trimming the teeth adjacent to the one missing, placing a mould and then allowing the laboratory to develop the bridge from a gold or a porcelain. The process takes around (3 visits or four weeks), and approximately two hours of the appointment. The bridge is placed of the adjacent teeth, the cemented firmly thus replacing the missing teeth. The outcome is normally outstanding.
The teeth appear natural, and the level of comfort is normally high for the majority of victims. The demerit of the process is considerably costing high and the likelihood that the tooth developed for the bridge may need root canal in the future. In certain instances, a bridge may not be applied, as in cases where teeth is lacking on one part of the missing tooth or many teeth lacking in a row, or the adjacent tooth have suffered an far-reaching bone loss as a result of a gum infection (Schmitt 2008).
Dental implant
The dental implant, which is anchored within the bone, also acts as root to the tooth. This implies that the teeth which are adjacent are not developed to replace the gap and the patient obtains the aesthetic pleasant outcome. Dental implant also lowers the stress placed on the teeth adjacent since it absorbs a portion of the pressure present at the time of usual chewing. Absolutely, it implies a firm bites on the coming ages and a minimal chance of establishing Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) concerns. The partial denture has the advantage of considerable ease of the process for the victim (in most cases very minimal, if any, preparation of the teeth is required), and the relatively low cost.
According to (Vargas 2007) an implant is a choice that is presently gaining an increasing reception for replacement of tooth. The method comprises placing a half centimeter and one to one rod of titanium fit into the jawbone so that the tooth can be replaced. The implant offers similar function to the tooth root. When the implant heals in the jawbone, the teeth can thereafter be attached to the implant, and as a result, replaces the teeth that are lacking. Implants best work in scenarios where it is not practically possible to use a bridge, though a permanent replacement of the tooth is needed. Implants appear really natural and also have the merit of preserving the adjacent teeth.
Disadvantages: According to (Dwan 2005) the implants are somehow invasive process, calling for minor oral surgery for the teeth replacement. They consume much time (in most instances, taking between six and nine months to complete), thus making it an expensive process. When more teeth are lacking, the cost is normally high exceeding all the other options of tooth replacement.
Partial denture: The last major choice for the replacement of tooth is the partial denture. Partial denture refers to prosthesis which is a removable device applied to replace to the missing tooth.
Disadvantages: The major disadvantage of the partial denture results from the unnatural feel (once requires much time to get along with the operations) and certain individuals develop difficulty in speaking and chewing with the replacement.
Similarly to all matters in life, the best choice is normally the most expensive. Dental implants are relatively expensive when the medical costs over lifetime are compared since they normally last significantly longer in comparison to other dental restoration options. The replacement of dental bridge is normally considered in every 15-20 years as a result of failure. Some of the most usual dental failure reasons comprise poor bone support of the tooth, a recurrent cavity and esthetically unpleasing look. In normal circumstances a denture is replaced in every 8 – 10 years. The common implications comprise worn or broken dentures, dentures which are ill-fitting because of bone changes and unaesthetic look as (Dwan 2005) suggested.
Costs implications:
The cost of dental implant must be looked into carefully prior to completing the process. The implant cost can be broken down into two major phases.
Fabricating a crown to shape the implant normally carried out by a prosthodontist or a general dentist.
The surgical tooth replacement in the jaw is normally carried out by an oral surgeon.
Conclusion:
When one chooses an implant, a bridge or a partial denture, it will rely on a number of factors. The patience and the dentist need to discuss the advantages as well as the challenges or the limitations of any of these choices before selecting how to restore or replace the teeth that is missing (Vargas 2007).
The dental implants can replace the gap occurring between teeth with no requirement for teeth modification. This gets rid of the possibility of any post-operative complications, for example, tooth sensitivity, and the possibility of the requirement of root canal treatment. Since a dental implant having a crown serves as an independent tooth, oral hygiene procedures is similar to the natural teeth. Some of the merits of putting an implant at the time of extracting the tooth comprise: there is no need for second surgery, because both the processes at done in a single visit, rapid process of treatment since there is no need to wait until the place heals and finally, there is minimal discomfort because only a single surgery is conducted.
References:
Awliya, W. (2004). High energy abrasion and resin cement bond to alumina core. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dwan, A. (2005), Effect of cement on fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Vargas, A. (2007). Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schmitt, A. (2008). The longitudinal clinical effectivness of osseointegrated dental implants for single-tooth replacement. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear Publishing
Scheller,H. (1998). Study on implant supported single crown restorations. Boston: McGraw Hill
