Transportation Barriers to Health Care Access
Nursing homework help
R E V I E W
Traveling Towards Disease: Transportation Barriers to Health Care Access
Samina T. Syed • Ben S. Gerber • Lisa K. Sharp
Published online: 31 March 2013
� Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013
Abstract Transportation barriers are often cited as bar-
riers to healthcare access. Transportation barriers lead to
rescheduled or missed appointments, delayed care, and
missed or delayed medication use. These consequences
may lead to poorer management of chronic illness and thus
poorer health outcomes. However, the significance of these
barriers is uncertain based on existing literature due to wide
variability in both study populations and transportation
barrier measures. The authors sought to synthesize the
literature on the prevalence of transportation barriers to
health care access. A systematic literature search of peer-
reviewed studies on transportation barriers to healthcare
access was performed. Inclusion criteria were as follows:
(1) study addressed access barriers for ongoing primary
care or chronic disease care; (2) study included assessment
of transportation barriers; and (3) study was completed in
the United States. In total, 61 studies were reviewed.
Overall, the evidence supports that transportation barriers
are an important barrier to healthcare access, particularly
for those with lower incomes or the under/uninsured.
Additional research needs to (1) clarify which aspects of
transportation limit health care access (2) measure the
impact of transportation barriers on clinically meaningful
outcomes and (3) measure the impact of transportation
barrier interventions and transportation policy changes.
Keywords Healthcare access � Transportation barriers � Medication access � Healthcare barriers
Introduction
Transportation is a basic but necessary step for ongoing
health care and medication access, particularly for those
with chronic diseases (Fig. 1). Chronic disease care requires
clinician visits, medication access, and changes to treat-
ment plans in order to provide evidence-based care.
However, without transportation, delays in clinical inter-
ventions result. Such delays in care may lead to a lack of
appropriate medical treatment, chronic disease exacerba-
tions or unmet health care needs, which can accumulate
and worsen health outcomes [1, 2].
Patients with transportation barriers carry a greater
burden of disease which may, in part, reflect the relation-
ship between poverty and transportation availability [3]. As
a result, understanding the relationship between transpor-
tation barriers and health may be important to addressing
health in the most vulnerable who live in poverty.
Transportation is often cited as a major barrier to health
care access [4–35]. Studies have found transportation barriers
impacting health care access in as little as 3 % or as much as
S. T. Syed (&) Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University
of Illinois at Chicago, 1819 W. Polk Street, M/C 640, Chicago,
IL 60612, USA
e-mail: samina.med@gmail.com
B. S. Gerber
Jesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Chicago,
IL 60612, USA
e-mail: bgerber@uic.edu
B. S. Gerber
Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois
at Chicago, MC 275, 454 Westside Research Office Bldg.,
1747 West Roosevelt Road, Chicago, IL 60608, USA
L. K. Sharp
Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois
at Chicago, MC 275, 463 Westside Research Office Bldg.,
1747 West Roosevelt Road, Chicago, IL 60608, USA
e-mail: sharpl@uic.edu
123
J Community Health (2013) 38:976–993
DOI 10.1007/s10900-013-9681-1
67 % of the population sampled [25, 36]. The wide variability
in study findings makes it difficult to determine the ultimate
impact that transportation barriers have on health.
This review summarizes and critically evaluates the
empirical evidence on transportation barriers to health care
access for primary and chronic disease care. For each of the
61 studies reviewed, we evaluated the population charac-
teristics, methods, measures of transportation barriers and
results (Table 1). Results are organized into three sections:
(1) measurement of transportation barriers, (2) transporta-
tion barriers and demographic differences, and (3) mea-
surement of the impact of transportation barriers.
Additionally, we define a research agenda based on gaps in
the literature and discuss potential intervention opportuni-
ties and public policy considerations.
Methods
We searched for peer-reviewed studies that addressed
transportation barriers in relation to ongoing health care
access. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) study
addressed access barriers for ongoing primary care or
chronic disease care; (2) study included assessment of
transportation barriers; and (3) study was completed in the
United States. Articles dealing with access to prenatal care,
emergency or acute care, or exclusive attention to general
screening and prevention were excluded as they may rep-
resent a single visit or limited time period of care.
We used PubMed with the following keyword search
terms (number of articles returned): transportation barriers
(963), transportation barriers clinic (129), transportation
barriers pharmacy (13), transportation barriers hospital
(183), transportation barriers doctor (69), transportation
barriers health access (276), and transportation barriers
chronic disease (33). Medical Subject Heading (MESH)
terms included health services accessibility AND trans-
portation (575). Additional background information was
found using the terms transportation barriers health access
to search Web of Science and Psych Info, and transpor-
tation barriers to search The New York Academy of
Medicine Library’s Grey Literature Report.
Abstracts were reviewed for inclusion criteria, and if
necessary, full text articles were also reviewed. A sec-
ondary review of bibliographies was also conducted. In the
final review, 61 articles met the inclusion criteria. The
search was concluded in December 2012.
Results
Measures of Transportation Barriers
Vehicle Access and Mode of Travel
Nine studies assessed the influence of vehicle access upon
access to health care, and all found a positive relationship
[24–26, 37–42]. Vehicle access refers to either owning a
car or having access to a car through a family member or
friend. Arcury et al. [37] studied the relationship of trans-
portation to health care utilization in 1,059 rural Appala-
chians and found that people who knew someone who
regularly provided rides to a member of their family had a
greater utilization of health care (Odds Ratio, OR 1.58).
Those with a driver’s license, independent of other factors,
also had greater health care utilization (OR 2.29).
Guidry et al. [26] surveyed 593 cancer patients throughout
Texas, and found 38 % of whites, 55 % of African Americans,
and 60 % of Hispanics identified poor access to a vehicle as a
barrier that could result in missing a cancer treatment.
A study by Salloum et al. [38] looked retrospectively
(2000–2007) at 406 cancer patients to see if patients were
more or less likely to receive first line chemotherapy based
on their demographics. Patients who were significantly less
likely to receive first line chemotherapy lived in neigh-
borhoods that had a higher percentage of households
without any vehicle. Distance to the nearest chemotherapy
facility was not a significant factor.
Rask et al. [40] studied obstacles to care for 3,897 urban,
low socioeconomic status (SES) adults in Atlanta and found
that walking or using public transportation to receive medi-
cal care was an independent predictor of not having a regular
source of care (OR 1.44). Patients who did not use private
transportation were also more likely to delay care (OR 1.45).
Patient
Improved Health Outcomes
Improved care based on clinical guidelines
Appropriate changes to medication regimen
Prevention of chronic disease complications
Timely Medical Care
Clinician Visit
Transportation
Timely Medication Access
New prescriptions/treatments
Medication refills
Fig. 1 Model of relationship between transportation, health care access and outcomes
J Community Health (2013) 38:976–993 977
123
T a
b le
1 S
tu d
ie s
o n
tr a n
sp o
rt a ti
o n
b a rr
ie rs
to h
e a lt
h c a re
a c c e ss
A u
th o
r P
o p
u la
ti o
n M
e th
o d
s M
e a su
re o
f tr
a n
sp o
rt a ti
o n
b a rr
ie rs
(# o
f it
e m
s)
R e su
lt s
A h
m e d
e t
a l.
[1 ]
N =
4 1
3 a d
u lt
s
U rb
a n
(D a y
to n
, O
h io
), lo
w S
E S
7 1
%
fe m
a le
, 4
8 %
B la
c k
, 4
2 %
A p
p a la
c h
ia n
D o
o r
to d
o o
r su
rv e y
o n
b a rr
ie rs
to h
e a lt
h
c a re
a c c e ss
‘‘ D
if fi
c u
lt y
fi n
d in
g tr
a n
sp o
rt a ti
o n
’’ (1
) ‘‘
H a rd
’’ o
r ‘‘
v e ry
h a rd
’’ ti
m e
fi n
d in
g
tr a n
sp o
rt a ti
o n
(3 1
% )
A rc
u ry
e t
a l.
[3 7
]
N =
1 ,0
5 9
a d
u lt
s
R u
ra l
(N o
rt h
C a ro
li n


