An Argumentative Essay- Plato’s ‘Crito’
The society in which we live is diverse. As such, there are people from various backgrounds. Interaction of people in such a setting may sometimes result to conflict. For people who are peppery tempered, such conflicts may pave way for crime, such as murder. Murder is regarded as one of the most heinous crimes that can be committed by man. From this perspective, the punishment that has always been meted out to murderers is severe to say the least. From life sentences to facing the ‘hangman’s noose’, ways have been devised and proposed for taking away another man’s life. Indeed, many pundits argue that murder is an unforgivable crime. The question is, should murder be punished by a similar means; death sentence to the convicted? In 1981, Larry Griffin was arrested on grounds of committing murder. The victim of the crime was Quintin Moss. Fourteen years later, in June 1995, Larry Griffin breathed his last as he succumbed to his punishment. Several years later, in 2005 the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund unearthed new evidence that strongly indicated that Griffin had been punished for a crime he did not have a hand in. One of the witnesses and victim to the shootout that claimed the life of Quintin Moss confirmed that Griffin was not the shooter. Later, further investigations showed that the potential perpetrators of the crime were three suspects who were then serving sentences in prison for a similar crime: murder. Larry Griffin is one example of numerous innocent civilians whose lives have been taken away by the same government that swore to protect them. Death sentence as the ultimate penalty for murder has existed for a long time. Proof of this is its mention in Plato’s Crito, a dialogue that was written centuries ago. Nevertheless, many nations all over the world and states in the US are giving up the sentence in preference for life imprisonment. This is after overwhelming evidence has emerged that some of the victims of death sentences are actually innocent. Today, thirty-two states still uphold death sentence as a form of punishment to murderers. Eighteen states have given up this form of punishment and the newest member of the group is the state of Maryland (Latzer, 321).
Thesis
The purpose of prisons and other similar facilities is to correct and to keep away people who are deemed dangerous away from the rest of the society. Death sentence does keep away the law-breakers from the rest of the society. However, it does not achieve the core objective of the facilities, which is to correct and rehabilitate. In this regard, it should be outlawed in all states. Death sentence, or capital punishment as it is also known is not only inhumane but also demeaning to the human race. Those who implement the law are not different from the murderers themselves. Just like the murderers and other law-breakers, they oversee the killing of another man. The rest of the citizens are not left out either, as they are party to the crime. Their contribution is remaining silent when our moral and ethical codes are being put in question.
As earlier mentioned, death sentence has been in existence for a long time. From the era of Socrates to present date is no short time. Its reason for existence centuries ago can be excused bearing in mind the barbarism and the lack of civility that dominated at the time. However, centuries later and with all the gains made in terms of every aspect of living, surely these old laws should have been consigned to extinction a long time ago. Death sentence is not only barbaric, but also a state-sanctioned murder that beats the logic of the existence of a government. As if that is not enough, death sentences are more often than not applied in a discriminatory manner. This has resulted in the murder of many innocent men and women.
Antithesis
Murder is arguably one of the most inhumane and heinous crimes. As such, a person who commits murder should be given a punishment that matches the degree of his or her crime. Capital punishment is the current ultimate punishment. Such a sentence not only deters other would-be murderers from indulging in their inhumane acts but also ensures that justice is served to the victim, including his or her friends and family. Death encompasses many people other than the deceased or the would-be deceased. Just like in Plato’s Crito it is brought to the attention of Socrates that his death will not only be a loss to his family and children but also to his friends who hold him dear at heart.
Due to the seriousness of murder, the punishment that accompanies the perpetrator should be equally serious (Allen et al, 17). The death penalty should be extended to all states for all murders because it is the only just punishment for taking one’s life. The punishment meted out depends on the situation. In other circumstances, life imprisonment might just be as effective and should suffice as punishment to the offender.
Synthesis
For the sake of sanity and not just argument, capital punishment should be done away with. It completely goes against the run of play with regard to the achievements made thus far by human civilization. There are a number of reasons on why death sentence should not be a part of our correctional systems anymore. To begin with, it is a barbaric way of punishing offenders. It started with the hangman’s noose where the offenders had ropes tied around their neck and support kicked from below their feet, leaving them hanging by the neck. However, this method has been changed to ‘modern’ methods, which include electrocution and injection with lethal drugs. The changes made do not make death sentence any less. Neither do they make the punishment more civilized. Death by electrocution in an electric chair is as barbaric as pelting one with stones, or any other method previously used.
There is nothing more heartfelt than having to pay for crimes you did not commit. The storyline reads even worse if the punishment for the crime is a death sentence. Such is the sad tale of a number of death row inmates. Many inmates have served decades of their sentences in death row only for evidence to emerge much later that they were innocent in the first place. This is only for the lucky few who someone cared to follow up their case after being convicted. How about the many more who have met their death for crimes they know little if not nothing about? Such is the life-changing story of Larry Griffin et al.
Murder is a sin and the Bible, one of the oldest books to be written, reiterates this fact. It does not matter who is the subject or object and whether it is legal or not the fact remains the same; it is murder. The government is not excused in this regard. In fact, capital punishment sounds even worse as other humans determine the fate of a fellow human. A death sentence is state sanctioned and this is against the spirit of good citizenship and good governance. When one unsuccessfully tries to commit suicide, an arrest ensues on grounds that one has no right of taking one’s life. On the other hand, the state has the right to take one’s life. What a world of irony we live in!
Death sentence has been abolished by most civilized nations because of its ethical, moral, and legal weaknesses. If we limit the maximum punishment to life without parole, these problems will no longer exist (Allen et al, 250).
ORDER A SIMILAR ESSAY WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH at : https://www.thenursinggeeks.com/
An Argumentative Essay- Plato’s ‘Crito’
The society in which we live is diverse. As such, there are people from various backgrounds. Interaction of people in such a setting may sometimes result to conflict. For people who are peppery tempered, such conflicts may pave way for crime, such as murder. Murder is regarded as one of the most heinous crimes that can be committed by man. From this perspective, the punishment that has always been meted out to murderers is severe to say the least. From life sentences to facing the ‘hangman’s noose’, ways have been devised and proposed for taking away another man’s life. Indeed, many pundits argue that murder is an unforgivable crime. The question is, should murder be punished by a similar means; death sentence to the convicted? In 1981, Larry Griffin was arrested on grounds of committing murder. The victim of the crime was Quintin Moss. Fourteen years later, in June 1995, Larry Griffin breathed his last as he succumbed to his punishment. Several years later, in 2005 the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund unearthed new evidence that strongly indicated that Griffin had been punished for a crime he did not have a hand in. One of the witnesses and victim to the shootout that claimed the life of Quintin Moss confirmed that Griffin was not the shooter. Later, further investigations showed that the potential perpetrators of the crime were three suspects who were then serving sentences in prison for a similar crime: murder. Larry Griffin is one example of numerous innocent civilians whose lives have been taken away by the same government that swore to protect them. Death sentence as the ultimate penalty for murder has existed for a long time. Proof of this is its mention in Plato’s Crito, a dialogue that was written centuries ago. Nevertheless, many nations all over the world and states in the US are giving up the sentence in preference for life imprisonment. This is after overwhelming evidence has emerged that some of the victims of death sentences are actually innocent. Today, thirty-two states still uphold death sentence as a form of punishment to murderers. Eighteen states have given up this form of punishment and the newest member of the group is the state of Maryland (Latzer, 321).
Thesis
The purpose of prisons and other similar facilities is to correct and to keep away people who are deemed dangerous away from the rest of the society. Death sentence does keep away the law-breakers from the rest of the society. However, it does not achieve the core objective of the facilities, which is to correct and rehabilitate. In this regard, it should be outlawed in all states. Death sentence, or capital punishment as it is also known is not only inhumane but also demeaning to the human race. Those who implement the law are not different from the murderers themselves. Just like the murderers and other law-breakers, they oversee the killing of another man. The rest of the citizens are not left out either, as they are party to the crime. Their contribution is remaining silent when our moral and ethical codes are being put in question.
As earlier mentioned, death sentence has been in existence for a long time. From the era of Socrates to present date is no short time. Its reason for existence centuries ago can be excused bearing in mind the barbarism and the lack of civility that dominated at the time. However, centuries later and with all the gains made in terms of every aspect of living, surely these old laws should have been consigned to extinction a long time ago. Death sentence is not only barbaric, but also a state-sanctioned murder that beats the logic of the existence of a government. As if that is not enough, death sentences are more often than not applied in a discriminatory manner. This has resulted in the murder of many innocent men and women.
Antithesis
Murder is arguably one of the most inhumane and heinous crimes. As such, a person who commits murder should be given a punishment that matches the degree of his or her crime. Capital punishment is the current ultimate punishment. Such a sentence not only deters other would-be murderers from indulging in their inhumane acts but also ensures that justice is served to the victim, including his or her friends and family. Death encompasses many people other than the deceased or the would-be deceased. Just like in Plato’s Crito it is brought to the attention of Socrates that his death will not only be a loss to his family and children but also to his friends who hold him dear at heart.
Due to the seriousness of murder, the punishment that accompanies the perpetrator should be equally serious (Allen et al, 17). The death penalty should be extended to all states for all murders because it is the only just punishment for taking one’s life. The punishment meted out depends on the situation. In other circumstances, life imprisonment might just be as effective and should suffice as punishment to the offender.
Synthesis
For the sake of sanity and not just argument, capital punishment should be done away with. It completely goes against the run of play with regard to the achievements made thus far by human civilization. There are a number of reasons on why death sentence should not be a part of our correctional systems anymore. To begin with, it is a barbaric way of punishing offenders. It started with the hangman’s noose where the offenders had ropes tied around their neck and support kicked from below their feet, leaving them hanging by the neck. However, this method has been changed to ‘modern’ methods, which include electrocution and injection with lethal drugs. The changes made do not make death sentence any less. Neither do they make the punishment more civilized. Death by electrocution in an electric chair is as barbaric as pelting one with stones, or any other method previously used.
There is nothing more heartfelt than having to pay for crimes you did not commit. The storyline reads even worse if the punishment for the crime is a death sentence. Such is the sad tale of a number of death row inmates. Many inmates have served decades of their sentences in death row only for evidence to emerge much later that they were innocent in the first place. This is only for the lucky few who someone cared to follow up their case after being convicted. How about the many more who have met their death for crimes they know little if not nothing about? Such is the life-changing story of Larry Griffin et al.
Murder is a sin and the Bible, one of the oldest books to be written, reiterates this fact. It does not matter who is the subject or object and whether it is legal or not the fact remains the same; it is murder. The government is not excused in this regard. In fact, capital punishment sounds even worse as other humans determine the fate of a fellow human. A death sentence is state sanctioned and this is against the spirit of good citizenship and good governance. When one unsuccessfully tries to commit suicide, an arrest ensues on grounds that one has no right of taking one’s life. On the other hand, the state has the right to take one’s life. What a world of irony we live in!
Death sentence has been abolished by most civilized nations because of its ethical, moral, and legal weaknesses. If we limit the maximum punishment to life without parole, these problems will no longer exist (Allen et al, 250).
ORDER A SIMILAR ESSAY WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH at : https://www.thenursinggeeks.com/
. An Argumentative Essay Platos Crito
An Argumentative Essay- Plato’s ‘Crito’
The society in which we live is diverse. As such, there are people from various backgrounds. Interaction of people in such a setting may sometimes result to conflict. For people who are peppery tempered, such conflicts may pave way for crime, such as murder. Murder is regarded as one of the most heinous crimes that can be committed by man. From this perspective, the punishment that has always been meted out to murderers is severe to say the least. From life sentences to facing the ‘hangman’s noose’, ways have been devised and proposed for taking away another man’s life. Indeed, many pundits argue that murder is an unforgivable crime. The question is, should murder be punished by a similar means; death sentence to the convicted? In 1981, Larry Griffin was arrested on grounds of committing murder. The victim of the crime was Quintin Moss. Fourteen years later, in June 1995, Larry Griffin breathed his last as he succumbed to his punishment. Several years later, in 2005 the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund unearthed new evidence that strongly indicated that Griffin had been punished for a crime he did not have a hand in. One of the witnesses and victim to the shootout that claimed the life of Quintin Moss confirmed that Griffin was not the shooter. Later, further investigations showed that the potential perpetrators of the crime were three suspects who were then serving sentences in prison for a similar crime: murder. Larry Griffin is one example of numerous innocent civilians whose lives have been taken away by the same government that swore to protect them. Death sentence as the ultimate penalty for murder has existed for a long time. Proof of this is its mention in Plato’s Crito, a dialogue that was written centuries ago. Nevertheless, many nations all over the world and states in the US are giving up the sentence in preference for life imprisonment. This is after overwhelming evidence has emerged that some of the victims of death sentences are actually innocent. Today, thirty-two states still uphold death sentence as a form of punishment to murderers. Eighteen states have given up this form of punishment and the newest member of the group is the state of Maryland (Latzer, 321).
Thesis
The purpose of prisons and other similar facilities is to correct and to keep away people who are deemed dangerous away from the rest of the society. Death sentence does keep away the law-breakers from the rest of the society. However, it does not achieve the core objective of the facilities, which is to correct and rehabilitate. In this regard, it should be outlawed in all states. Death sentence, or capital punishment as it is also known is not only inhumane but also demeaning to the human race. Those who implement the law are not different from the murderers themselves. Just like the murderers and other law-breakers, they oversee the killing of another man. The rest of the citizens are not left out either, as they are party to the crime. Their contribution is remaining silent when our moral and ethical codes are being put in question.
As earlier mentioned, death sentence has been in existence for a long time. From the era of Socrates to present date is no short time. Its reason for existence centuries ago can be excused bearing in mind the barbarism and the lack of civility that dominated at the time. However, centuries later and with all the gains made in terms of every aspect of living, surely these old laws should have been consigned to extinction a long time ago. Death sentence is not only barbaric, but also a state-sanctioned murder that beats the logic of the existence of a government. As if that is not enough, death sentences are more often than not applied in a discriminatory manner. This has resulted in the murder of many innocent men and women.
Antithesis
Murder is arguably one of the most inhumane and heinous crimes. As such, a person who commits murder should be given a punishment that matches the degree of his or her crime. Capital punishment is the current ultimate punishment. Such a sentence not only deters other would-be murderers from indulging in their inhumane acts but also ensures that justice is served to the victim, including his or her friends and family. Death encompasses many people other than the deceased or the would-be deceased. Just like in Plato’s Crito it is brought to the attention of Socrates that his death will not only be a loss to his family and children but also to his friends who hold him dear at heart.
Due to the seriousness of murder, the punishment that accompanies the perpetrator should be equally serious (Allen et al, 17). The death penalty should be extended to all states for all murders because it is the only just punishment for taking one’s life. The punishment meted out depends on the situation. In other circumstances, life imprisonment might just be as effective and should suffice as punishment to the offender.
Synthesis
For the sake of sanity and not just argument, capital punishment should be done away with. It completely goes against the run of play with regard to the achievements made thus far by human civilization. There are a number of reasons on why death sentence should not be a part of our correctional systems anymore. To begin with, it is a barbaric way of punishing offenders. It started with the hangman’s noose where the offenders had ropes tied around their neck and support kicked from below their feet, leaving them hanging by the neck. However, this method has been changed to ‘modern’ methods, which include electrocution and injection with lethal drugs. The changes made do not make death sentence any less. Neither do they make the punishment more civilized. Death by electrocution in an electric chair is as barbaric as pelting one with stones, or any other method previously used.
There is nothing more heartfelt than having to pay for crimes you did not commit. The storyline reads even worse if the punishment for the crime is a death sentence. Such is the sad tale of a number of death row inmates. Many inmates have served decades of their sentences in death row only for evidence to emerge much later that they were innocent in the first place. This is only for the lucky few who someone cared to follow up their case after being convicted. How about the many more who have met their death for crimes they know little if not nothing about? Such is the life-changing story of Larry Griffin et al.
Murder is a sin and the Bible, one of the oldest books to be written, reiterates this fact. It does not matter who is the subject or object and whether it is legal or not the fact remains the same; it is murder. The government is not excused in this regard. In fact, capital punishment sounds even worse as other humans determine the fate of a fellow human. A death sentence is state sanctioned and this is against the spirit of good citizenship and good governance. When one unsuccessfully tries to commit suicide, an arrest ensues on grounds that one has no right of taking one’s life. On the other hand, the state has the right to take one’s life. What a world of irony we live in!
Death sentence has been abolished by most civilized nations because of its ethical, moral, and legal weaknesses. If we limit the maximum punishment to life without parole, these problems will no longer exist (Allen et al, 250).
ORDER A SIMILAR ESSAY WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH at : https://www.thenursinggeeks.com/
