social science capstone. Psychological Perspectives on Social Issues
Author
Tutor
Course
Date
Part ONEPsychological Perspectives on Social Issues
Research has always indicated that there is a relationship between the societal behavior and individual behavior. This research revolved around prejudice and discrimination, and whether it has its roots in genetics. The group argued that the characteristics of any person are determined by his DNA and gene transmission, in which case prejudice and discrimination are gained through inheritance or genetics. This is according to the evolutionally perspective on social psychology, which states that this behavior can be explained through the role of gene transmission and biology across generations. However, one of the members of the group felt that the behavior can only be explained through the sociocultural perspective. He stressed on the importance of culture and social norms in shaping behavior and opined that people, especially children, learn behavior via interactions with adults and other children. In essence, the societal norms and values are imparted in them.
Part TWO
Psychological Reflections on Online Academic Dynamics
Online learning is a relatively new phenomenon, at least as far as the courses that I have been taking are concerned. My experience of online learning can only be explained via the social-cognitive perspective, where I noticed, interpreted and judged other people’s behaviors. I have come to assimilate and accommodate new experiences using beliefs that I already held, as well as altering some of the existing beliefs in response to certain events. The incorporation of regular updates in the online classroom pushed me to be attentive as I could always expect fresh, new content that added value to the learning experience. My response to these regular updates has changed albeit minimally. I have not only become more inquisitive but have been following up on any pertinent issues through research and initiating discussions.
I have noted, however, that some of my fellow students in the online classroom have been a bit pushy especially private discussion areas that involve live chats. Not only do they dominate discussions, but they also get irritated to the point of using obscenities in case their perspective is not adopted. Nevertheless, I have admired individuals who are supportive in online classes to the point of explaining the simplest of details to slow learners. This is because it not only promotes cohesion in group discussions but also enhances learning.
Part THREERamifications of a Solution
The elimination of prejudice and racial discrimination would have profound social and psychological ramifications. The relationship between people of diverse racial backgrounds would be enhanced, with the possibility of an increase in peace among the varied groups. It is imperative, however, that the group under study change the notion or belief that there are certain groups that are superior to others merely on the basis of the color of their skin. The notion that prejudice and racial discrimination is embedded in one’s DNA or genes and is, therefore, inherited or transmitted through generations is fallacious. If anything, a combination of factors is responsible for behavior, with socialization being one of the key factors that influence behavior. It goes without saying that the cohesiveness of the group and society at large would be enhanced through the resolution of this problem, which is, of course, a positive outcome.
Part FOUREthical Research in the Social Sciences
The importance of ethics in social science research cannot be gainsaid. In a research study that aimed at examining beliefs on the roots of prejudice and racial discrimination, a sample population of 17 subjects was chosen. These people had to be above 18 years of age, have some formal education, American citizens, as well as be in either formal or informal employment. They also were not coerced into participating in this research, rather they participated voluntarily by their own volition. The population was only required to answer questions from a questionnaire about their experiences and views on prejudice. However, it is unethical that the researchers would discuss the information that other respondents had given them with the subsequent respondents. Not only did this information distort the subsequent respondent’s views and responses, but it was also likely to cause tension among the respondents. This is especially considering that the respondents were fairly known to each other. In some instances, they were asked questions in the presence of other people. This breached the element of confidentiality, which is the central pillar of any research.