social norm violation

/in /by

32645358851265450000

21005803131820SOCIAL NORMS VIOLATION

0SOCIAL NORMS VIOLATION

Discussion

The experiment was to determine the contagiousness of social norms violation to the people in public places by denoting how people are to react with positive norms that seem not be normal because of the nature of its approach. The case that presents itself is deemed to be seasoned as many people ignore the how social norms should be presented and acted upon. According to the finding, it is clear that the social norm violated is positive but the reactions of the people is negative. For example, excusing oneself to take water in a public place is positive norm that should not be considered a violation, but the society is not used to the social norm of asking for permission to take s drink hence violation of the norm. As indicated in the finding there was mixed reaction from the participants. Some were annoyed, some worried, and other accepted social norm violation as a normality; showed me the door to the toilet and bathroom. Such reactions depicts ignorance hypothesis of social norms violation.

. According to Shannon (2000) group members are noted to be more sensitive to nonconformity from generic social norms when in their in-groups, they claim that implementation these norms is not always considered as important. This is evident based on the reactions evident in the experiment, the participants who were in a group showed a varied response as compared to those who were alone; some responded because they louder voice of the group responded not considering the extent of the violation of the social norm. With respect to the above sentiments from the stated, scholars, Prentice & Miller (1993) stated that individuals choose groups that conform to their social norms and avoid those that violate the social norms. When groups of individuals are grouped on the same social norms, they are seen as holding the same social norms and moral ideas and when the group members shy away from following these norms they ignore the norms that define the group hence considered as violators of the group. In most cases social setting or group members often remove these individuals from the group. The findings indicate that violation of social norms does not depend on the wrong aspects of the norm, but the feeling of the people concerning the norm.

According to Clinard & Meier (2010) an individual who violates a social norm tends to provoke normal societal differentiation. The findings indicates that other individuals or people are known to Judge the social norm violators severely and always distance them from the rest of the society with an aim of not affecting others. Another violation of social norms are sometimes castigated, there exist several exceptions considered. This is true since as of the case of the experiment, there were varied reaction to the norm violation, this depended on the exposure of the participant regarding the social norm. Based on the findings it can be argued that the violators of social norms may not know the impacts of their violation as well as the positivity of the social norm to the society hence should not be considered as outcast within the social setting.

From the findings, it can be concluded that social norm build the way that human beings live and individuals should learn how to adapt to the change of what is determined as acceptable behaviours in the society. Therefore, it is worth mentioning the violation accept of as it offers individuals an understanding on the right side of behaviour that leads to upright norms in the society, however, based on the limited information in contemporary literature, it is worth undertaking further research in order to understand how different people react to violation of social norms and the reasons why the violators are seen as negative people in the society.

References

Campo, S., Cameron, K. A., Brossard, D., & Frazer, M. S. (2004). Social norms and expectancy violation theories: Assessing the effectiveness of health communication campaigns. Communication Monographs, 71(4), 448-470.

Christensen, P. N., Rothgerber, H., Wood, W., & Matz, D. C. (2004). Social norms and identity relevance: A motivational approach to normative behavior.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(10), 1295-1309.

Clinard, M., & Meier, R. (2010). Sociology of deviant behavior. Cengage Learning.

Posner, E. A. (2009). Law and social norms. Harvard University Press.

Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of personality and social psychology, 64(2), 243.

Shannon, V. P. (2000). Norms are what states make of them: the political psychology of norm violation. International Studies Quarterly, 44(2), 293-316.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 6-8 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Get Answer Over WhatsApp Order Paper Now